The Cirque du Soleil wanted a headquarters that would reflect
its imaginative, risk-taking ethos--and found it on the brink of
a fire-
breathing pit.
by Ellen Barry
"'Wasteland' is a good word," Claude Brault says cheerfully, looking
out across the Cirque du Soleil's new kingdom. "It's a non-site.
It was designed by default, created out of emptiness, then filled
with garbage. And now we have decided to create something."
Give or take a few rhetorical flourishes, Brault's got it about
right. Outside the window of the executive suite, where he is
standing, is an urban panorama as landscaped by Dante. Beyond
the craters of the abandoned quarry, beyond the tongues of flame
burning off underground gas, on top of 39 years of Montreal's
accumulated waste matter, you can sometimes make out the cloud
of birds hovering over fresh trash. Brault, who commissions artworks
for the Cirque du Soleil's new complex, peers out across the distance
and can't get enough of it. "It's like hell," he says several
times, with obvious delight.
For a company whose local star power approaches supernova status,
the former Miron quarry might seem like a strange choice, but--as
any of its planners will tell you--the Cirque du Soleil is a corporation
at home with paradox. Thus, the Studio: a $40 million complex
designed by Montreal's most talked-about architect, unveiled beside
one of Montreal's poorest neighborhoods, overlooking the second
biggest landfill in North America. The rock-bottom land price
($1.10 Canadian per square foot, compared to $85 to $100 downtown)
had something to do with it, but the explanation of company officials
is more romantic: They believe that the Cirque du Soleil is uniquely
capable of transforming this no-man's-land into an urban treasure.
Standing at the lip of a garbage-filled quarry, with a raised
expressway to the east, subsidized housing to the north, and a
belching power plant to the south, a visitor may find it an optimistic
view.
"It's a gamble," says Gaeton Morency, the Cirque's vice president
of planning and development, who has overseen the move. "It takes
some imagination. But we have never been lacking in imagination."
There was a moment in the Cirque du Soleil's history when failure
was possible. In 1985, it was little more than a troupe of street
performers $750,000 in debt, and they flopped, dramatically, in
Niagara Falls. Touring under the unfortunate name "Sun Circus,"
they canceled shows because they couldn't coax 75 customers into
a 1,500-seat arena. Of those who came, some were so disappointed
not to see animals that they asked for their money back. Meanwhile,
loan officers were turning away the 25-year-old founders, Guy
Laliberté and Daniel Gaul-thier, informing them laconically that
they didn't work with clowns.
"We were giving away tickets on the street," recalls Jean David,
the vice president of marketing, who has been with the Cirque
since the beginning. "We learned a lot about ourselves. When you
say 'Sun Circus,' it means a traditional circus, with elephants.
But when you say 'Cirque du Soleil,' that's different. If you
have been to university, then you have some idea that this might
be French, and then, if you're curious, you might ask questions,
and then you hear about it from friends."
The Cirque discovered a demographic that was educated, middle-class,
largely female, and far from Niagara Falls. By 1987, when the
Cirque played Los Angeles, the show was sending reviewers into
emotional transports over its drama and creativity. In the end,
the Cirque succeeded by ignoring the conventional wisdom of the
circus industry: no elephants, no ringleader, no irreplaceable
stars.
Instead, the company stages seamless productions built around
single, often metaphysical themes. For instance, the main character
of Quidam, which opens in New York this month, is a headless,
overcoated man out of René Magritte, a surreal hero who symbolizes
modern isolation. It's highbrow stuff, as the $40 ticket prices
suggest, but the arty mix of theater and circus has proven a successful
formula. Today, the Cirque du Soleil is planning to double its
number of touring shows to eight, and its revenues to $300 million,
over the next two years.
But David emphasizes that any member of the company can still
walk into the copresidents' offices with a problem. In the midst
of frantic expansion, the Cirque's philosophy has changed little
since the days when Laliberté was eating fire for donations on
the sidewalk.
"To be a creator, you also have to have a little bit of anarchy,"
human resources vice president Marc Gagnon told the Toronto-based
Globe and Mail last year. "If you overmanage, you get a lousy
show."
The completed Studio, which houses the company's 500 local employees,
reflects that daring. For the job, the Cirque chose Dan Hanganu,
the Romanian-born architect whose massive, mineral profiles have
shocked and reshaped Montreal. Hanganu's blocky, industrial Montreal
Museum of Archaeology and History at Pointe-à-Callière, which
confronts picturesque Old Montreal, established him as an important,
if controversial, architectural player in 1992. It won both the
province's prestigious Governor-General's award for artistic achievement,
which is rarely awarded to an architect, and the Lemon Prize from
the preservationist group Save Montreal for "impoverishing the
architectural landscape of Montreal" with a style the society
described as "Soviet nuclear plant."
The Cirque complex has proven less divisive. Even Save Montreal
has amended its view of Hanganu, awarding the project its laudatory
Orange Prize for achievement in urban planning. In this building,
Hanganu restrained his affection for bare stone; the checkered,
corrugated-aluminum facade winks at the desolate landscape with
tiny visual jokes. One exterior wall is studded with bicycle reflectors,
which jump out like sequins in the sun. Round windows cluster
in a corner as if a fish had bubbled them out. Tiny, circular
wire brushes are set into another wall like a row of miniature
suns, a clever echo of the Cirque's motif.
The building's interior is a tribute to the Cirque's slightly
chaotic management style. Walking down the alley-like central
spine--which is flooded with natural light and lined with matte
metal and rosy chipboard--a visitor gets glimpses into a dozen
ventricles of this New Age circus, as little girls in tracksuits
dart between practice rooms. Jutting off from the spine are immense
rehearsal studios, where gymnasts in Metallica T-shirts stretch
endlessly and trapeze artists fall into pits full of foam rubber.
In the costume studio, high shelves hold plaster casts of every
performer's head, plus some torsos, for long-distance costume
work. The Studios' movable walls invite rearrangement--a provision
whose necessity was brought home to the architects as they poured,
and repoured, and repoured the building's foundations in response
to the Cirque's changing requirements.
"It was a pretty turbulent project from the onset...like the show
creation process," Morency says in retrospect, with a rueful smile.
"But we set things in concrete when we are building."
The main conceptual specifications never changed, though--the Cirque
wanted enough structure to accommodate unpredictable growth while
avoiding the visual trappings of corporate culture. Accordingly,
the interior is playful and open, focused around a large communal
kitchen that occasionally sends the scent of vegetable soup wafting
down the central spine and throughout the building. Corners offer
surprise views into adjoining spaces, so that office workers can
watch flipping tumblers and acrobats.
For the circus, such crosscurrents are both a relief and a novelty.
Before the Studio opened, housing the Cirque du Soleil was like
buying clothes for a child in the middle of a growth spurt. Over
the last 13 years, the Cirque du Soleil's personnel has soared
from 10 people to 1,300, and that number is expected to rise to
2,170 in the next two years. When Morency joined the company,
in 1992, it was working in 16 different locations in Montreal--with
the closest available rehearsal facility for trapeze artists halfway
around the world in Moscow.
When Hanganu's building was unveiled, in February of 1997, it
was the first time the staff could work together without crossing
town five times a day. "I talk to a lot of cab drivers," Morency
says. "They've lost a lot of business."
Questioned about their choice of sites, Cirque officials like
to say that circus people have always been freaks and pariahs
banished to the outskirts of town; but the truth is that today
they are seen as gold-plated corporate citizens. In building the
Studio, as in other ventures, the company received help from both
the provincial and city governments, covering almost half the
construction costs--a total of $9.6 million.
It wasn't a giveaway, though. In return, the company has committed
to revamping this neighborhood. The next time the circus performs
in Montreal, the big top will be planted on a flat oval adjacent
to the building, looking out onto the quarry. The Cirque also
agreed to enliven a desolate stretch of highway by building a
residential village for performers along the southeastern edge
of the site--running alongside a raised expressway--by 2000. It's
already put some of its clout to work by convincing city officials
to move a depot of stinking garbage trucks that locals had complained
about for years. For neighborhood leaders, the circus is an unquestionable
plus.
"As long as what they want and what we want are the same thing,"
says Léo Bricault, who edits the local Journal de St. Michel,
"it's going to be okay."
In fact, the Studio's construction could prove to be the easy
part of the Cirque's project, because the Cirque du Soleil built
its headquarters smack in the middle of a world-class urban dilemma.
It's not often you find a landfill the size of three football
fields in the middle of a residential metropolitan neighborhood--environmental
experts come from all over the world just to study the way Montreal
manages the gas and runoff. As much as everyone would like to
shut it down, there are two big problems: First, there's no alternate
location for a landfill; and second, Miron's managers signed a
contract to accept 39 million tons of garbage, which will not
be fulfilled for years.
The quarry's neighbors have been engaged in this struggle since
the Cirque's founders were in diapers. Bricault can catalogue
35 years of municipal foot-dragging--first, promises from the quarry
to stop dynamiting, then promises to stem methane gas leakage
from the decomposing garbage, then promises, one after the other,
to stop dumping altogether. Bring up the planned park that city
officials envision for the site, and Bricault looks slightly weary.
"In 1984, they showed us views of a golf course and said 'this
will be here within 10 years,'" he says. "One administration will
give us a good bulletin, and then they lose an election and we
start over again."
Local activists frequently bring up a McGill University study
performed in the early Nineties that showed a 20 percent rise
in certain types of cancer in the neighborhood. No one can prove
a direct link, but Bricault maintains that the city planners have
no idea how to manage four decades' worth of garbage. Northwest
of the Cirque's glittering complex are layers of decaying waste
extending 175 feet below the Earth's surface. The Studio itself
was built on solid land, and Cirque officials are serenely confident
that the trash is too far away to affect them--certainly its smell
rarely reaches the Studio--but the landfill to the north settles
so much that the surface sinks 15 feet every year.
"At the time they were dumping at the bottom, there were no rules
forbidding you to put anything dangerous there," Bricault says.
"It could be anything. Nobody knows."
Hélène Dubé, a local environmental activist, agrees. "I'm very
suspicious about having a park above meters and meters of trash,"
she says. If she had kids, she isn't sure she would let them play
there.
Of course, the Cirque du Soleil has some practice making something
out of nothing, as its St. Michel neighbors--mostly immigrants
from Haiti, Central America, and Vietnam--are rapidly learning.
Settled beside a low-income area, desiring fruit trees and decorative
patches of corn and pumpkins, but not the fences that go along
with them, the Cirque enlisted underemployed local young people
to help with planting and told them they were free to take a limited
portion of the harvest home for themselves. Other St. Michel youths
got jobs in security. Circus employees went door to door delivering
35,000 invitations to visit the buildings. Gradually, almost unconsciously,
the neighborhood of St. Michel has become invested in the Cirque
project.
Speaking of the local youths, Dubé, who helped coordinate the
planting program, says, "They are the ones--or maybe have friends,
or relatives--who are doing the graffiti and vandalism. But since
they planted the tree, they won't let anyone touch their tree."
And as a result, the Cirque's construction has worked a minor
public miracle: People who had long ago given up on this land--people
who have lived next door to a fence for their whole lives--are
thinking in terms of renewal. The Gazmont plant, which was completed
last year, collects underground gas and converts it into enough
electricity to power 30,000 homes. The chain supermarket Maxi
Plus has followed Cirque du Soleil's lead and opened a branch
on the opposite corner of the site, and there is talk about a
major cinema complex. Even a skeptic like Bricault, the newspaper
editor, marvels at that.
"Before Cirque du Soleil, everyone who lived around St. Michel
said, 'Oh, this is the dump,'" he says. "With the coming of the
Cirque du Soleil, the perception has changed. It's not garbage
now."
Except, of course, that it is. The garbage trucks still deposit
2,000 tons of garbage every day, above who knows how many layers
of collapsing trash. The real test will come next year, when the
show returns to Montreal, bringing more people to the edge of
the dump than ever before. It's a peculiar spot to pitch a $40
million circus tent, but don't try to tell the Cirque that. "They'll
come," Morency says calmly. "We could go a lot farther and people
would still come."
They'll come and, he implies, they'll stay. He envisions people
playing in fields, dozing in the grass, watching movies projected
onto the wall of the Studio, all this in a neighborhood Morency
recalls from his childhood as a high fence and a smell of decay.
How long does St. Michel have to wait for this transformation?
Bricault, the editor, suggests I stop by in 20 years. Dubé, the
environmental activist, ventures to say 10. And the Cirque's Morency
says to come back in three years. Now that would be pure magic.
Ellen Barry has been a staff reporter for the Moscow Times and the Boston
Phoenix.
|
|