Once a world's fair folly, the revolving restaurant took over
the country and then the world, becoming a gently turning symbol
of optimism and progress.
by Tom Vanderbilt
Architecture or revolution. I am reminded of Le Corbusier's declaration
as I sit in The View, the revolving restaurant atop the Marriot
Marquis hotel in New York's Times Square. On one side the $12.95
all-you-can-eat buffet glides by; on the other, a shimmering twilight
vista stretches into New Jersey. Revolutions come once an hour
here--but can this bricolage of chrome, airport-lounge carpeting,
stucco, and maroon Naugahyde cushions, where all emphasis is on
looking away from the building, really be architecture? John Portman,
the architect-developer who designed the Marquis and many other
hotels crowned with revolving restaurants, once said (after Goethe),
"I consider architecture frozen music." Sitting here, though,
I feel a certain glacial dissipation, as if the building were
slowly melting in time with the ice in the blue drinks, or at
least with the Rupert Holmes song playing overhead.
The revolving restaurant is an American idea that conquered the
world. What began as an architectural folly for the 1962 World's
Fair has spread to almost every corner of the globe, atop broadcast
towers like the Space Needle and crowning modern glass-and-steel
hotels. As the long postwar boom of American-led trade and tourism
marched on through the Sixties, Seventies, and Eighties, these
spinning dining rooms became symbols of optimism, progress, and
success.
Yet Americans have cooled to the dynamic dining they helped popularize.
Some revolving restaurants have simply stopped rotating, others
have been refurbished into conference centers; their novelty has
long been supplanted by Rainforest Cafés, IMAX theaters, and corporate
skyboxes. Only one revolving restaurant--the Stratosphere in Las
Vegas--has been built in the U.S. this decade, and even that has
to compete with a roller coaster perched atop it and a casino
at its base.
To begin to understand their appeal, one must now look to Asia,
Africa, and the Middle East, where the revolving restaurant is
still seen as a sign of progress--an emblem of prosperity, not
kitsch. Indeed, they have become more indicators of economic development
than adornments to the skyline. During the 1990s, a new wave of
revolving restaurants swept around the world, from Lebanon to
Jakarta to Cairo; often, their openings occasioned visits by heads
of state and much adulatory press. (The restaurant atop the 674-foot
Saddam Tower in Baghdad may be the only one actually named for
a head of state.) When the Forte Grand Hotel opened in Abu Dhabi
in 1993, Gulf Construction magazine enthused that "the crowning
glory of the hotel is the rooftop revolving restaurant, a masterpiece
of modern technology."
As Bangkok, Singapore, and other Southeast Asian cities became
economic powerhouses in the last two decades, they bloomed with
skyscraping hotels, which, as Portman and Hyatt proved here in
the 1970s and 1980s, were not complete without a slowly revolving
dining attraction at their summit. Now, with the region's euphoria
undone by a series of financial crises, those revolving restaurants
are not only a reminder of the recent boom, but are taken as a
sign that all is not lost. An ad for Malaysia in the business
press shows the 1,381-foot Menara Kuala Lumpur tower (capped with
the Seri Angkasa restaurant) and declares: "Why the dark clouds
of economic uncertainty will soon blow over." In North Korea,
the government funneled scarce resources into the pyramidal Ryugyong
Hotel, which has a (soon to be) revolving restaurant crowning
its 105 stories. (The hotel, still unfinished, awaits Pyongyang's
tourist boom.) In China, a spate of building in the 1980s prompted
a cautionary note in the People's Daily: "After Canton's Flower
Garden Hotel built its revolving restaurant, every other place
followed the same example and paid no attention to actual conditions
and requirements."
The idea of dinner accompanied by a high-altitude view dates back
at least to the Eiffel Tower, which has had a restaurant at its
second "platform" since it opened in 1889. The notion of sedentary
consumers taking in a mechanized 360-degree view of their environment
is also a nineteenth-century creation: at panoramas, people sat
in circular theaters and watched as painted scenery of London
or Paris passed before their eyes. This century gradually brought
the technological advances that would make possible the Space
Needle, the Marquis, and the Stratosphere. Visitors to the 1939
New York World's Fair were transported by the automated "helicline"
walkway into the dome-like Perisphere, and then were rotated around
the model "Democracity" on an outer revolving ring. By the late
Fifties, revolving stages were common in film and theatrical productions,
while the wonders of Detroit whirled slowly on auto show platforms.
At about the same time, television broadcast towers began to rise
around the world. In 1957, Fritz Leonhardt designed the 445-foot
Stuttgart TV tower; at its pinnacle was a cylindrical (non-revolving)
restaurant that drew nearly a million visitors its first year.
In 1961 John Graham, a Seattle architect, acolyte of Buckminster
Fuller, and early shopping mall pioneer, built the very first
revolving restaurant, La Ronde, atop an office building at the
Ala Moana Shopping Center in Ho-nolulu. A year later, he was commissioned
to design the Space Needle for the Seattle World's Fair. Shown
a postcard of the Stuttgart television tower and a rough sketch
of the proposed Seattle tower, Graham was reportedly immediately
inspired: "Let's make the restaurant revolve." If the Otis Elevator
was the Eiffel Tower's technological showpiece, then the Eye of
the Needle--which usually gets the credit as the world's first
revolving restaurant, in spite of La Ronde--was the Space Needle's
crowning achievement. A Graham press release noted that in pre-installation
tests, the turntable--which weighed 90 tons yet could be pushed
by hand--was vibration-free: "A cigarette stood on its end, a half-dollar
balanced on its edge and its timing had the precision of a fine
electric clock."
It is difficult now to imagine the level of fascination the Eye
of the Needle provoked. As soon as it was built, it starred alongside
Elvis in the (somewhat forgettable) It Happened at the World's
Fair. Lincoln Kirstein, writing in The Nation, marveled that the
restaurant was "so perfectly balanced that a one-horsepower motor
is all that is required to swing" it. (Keep in mind, though, that
like all revolving restaurants, only a portion of the inside--the
"turntable"--actually rotates.) An Eye of the Needle waitress told
Life that "serving the soup is like catching the brass ring on
a merry-go-round"; color-coded sections helped waitresses find
customers. The elevators were so full of visitors during the day
that food had to be delivered at night with "precision estimates
of the day's needs." A New Yorker cartoon showed two people looking
up at the imposing Needle; one deadpanned, "I'm not that hungry."
The Space Needle put the revolving restaurant on the map. Suddenly,
every city was clamoring for one of Graham's patented revolving
restaurants (or perhaps someone else's: Rod Kirkwood, an engineer
who worked with Graham, says, "We learned fairly early on that
a patent didn't keep somebody from doing what we had done"). The
revolving restaurant became not just a big tourist draw but a
must-have weapon in the civic arsenal of every latter-day Babbitt:
revolving restaurants were the riverboat casinos of the Sixties
and Seventies. In 1968, Business Week reported that the Hyatt
hotel chain, prompted by the success of its Polaris in Atlanta,
would build a revolving restaurant atop every new hotel. In Europe,
Leonhardt's Stuttgart tower had touched off an explosion of tower
building; the new ones, however, from Mannheim to Moscow, had
revolving restaurants. It was even rumored that the Fernseh-turm
in East Berlin moved particularly fast, so people in the West
could see that it revolved, a demonstration of the technological
superiority of the GDR.
The desire for views--heightened by everything from Cinemascope
to the advent of mass airline travel--and the culture of convenience
intersected in the revolving restaurant, which emerged as the
seminal "entertainment restaurant." For pop-culture taxonomists
Jane and Michael Stern, they were essential to the space-age bachelor's
mastery-over-nature lifestyle, described in Sixties People: ".
. . zooming through the clouds in a 707 to some swinging pleasure
capital, seducing a voluptuous woman in his penthouse above the
city, and, most deliciously, indulging in fine cuisine and oenophilic
pleasures somewhere on top of the world." There were deeper motivations,
too. A "consumer psychology specialist" told Business Week that
"eating while revolving speaks to some of the major ambivalences
of our time. In a revolving restaurant you can achieve stability
and still be going someplace." And with Sputnik's launch and John
Glenn's flight still reverberating, there may have been a subconscious
desire to be closer to space, to "orbit" in climate-controlled
comfort around the glittering urban constellation, served by airline-style
attendants wearing blue uniforms with red capes
But as revolving restaurants sprouted like metallic dandelions
in every arriviste burgh from Houston to Columbus, they began
to lose their novelty, moving from futurist icon to banal convention
center appendage. And in buildings like Atlanta's Peachtree Plaza
Hotel and Los Angeles's Bonaventure Hotel, built amid the urban
tension of the early 1970s, the revolving restaurant can be seen
as part of an attempt to shut the city out by presenting it as
a distant spectacle--what postmodern theorist Fredric Jameson,
writing about the top of the Bonaventure, calls a "contemplative
spectacle of the city itself, now transformed into its own images
by the glass windows through which you view it."
Rotation, not location, is central to revolving restaurant real
estate. Often, these restaurants were built in spite of their
view (or lack thereof). Mark Franklin, a partner in Baldwin &
Franklin Architects, whose revolving restaurant projects include
the Canadian National Tower in Toronto, explains that there doesn't
seem to be "a correlation between [a revolving restaurant] and
the relative beauty or ugliness of the surrounding environment."
Business Week noted in 1968 that the roof below a revolving restaurant
in Springfield, Massachusetts, was landscaped "to compensate for
the dull view"; and in Taipei, a revolving restaurant was planned
above a garbage incinerator ("Diners can enjoy the view of Taipei
and also examine the cleanliness of our garbage incinerator,"
a worker told Taiwan Television Enterprise magazine). At La Mirador
on the outskirts of Havana, a small wood-paneled revolving (if
occasionally lurching) restaurant perched atop an East Bloc-ish
slab of concrete, I recently enjoyed "cocktails and landscape"--the
latter being the expanses of Jose Martí Airport and Parque Lenin.
Even a stunning view is no guarantee of success, however; there
are many unique design considerations in planning a restaurant
that will not only rotate, but please its patrons. Most important,
according to Franklin, is getting people "close to the glass."
He explains that "larger turntables offer a very high percentage
of the patrons proximity to the circumference of the circle."
Those who cannot sit next to the glass will need to see over those
who can; "inevitably," Franklin continues, "these things end up
with more complexity from a topographical point of view than you
would find in an internalized restaurant." Ideally, tour groups
should be separated from the "birthday and anniversary crowd."
Then there is what Franklin calls the "stupid stuff." Visitors
should not be presented with an overwhelming view the moment they
step out of the elevator. Wayfinding devices need to account for
the kinetic floor plan. The light must be constant so that moving
diners can read their menus without distraction. Yet providing
sufficient interior light presents the problem of creating interior
reflections; most revolving restaurants use inclined glazing to
shift images up or down.
Everything rests on the turntable, of course. More than 75 percent
of the world's restaurant turntables are made by the Danbury,
Connecticut--based Macton Corporation. Its platforms have speed
controls (while most restaurants stick to the once-an-hour schedule,
they can be tuned to rotate once every 50 minutes, to get the
lunch crowd out more quickly), and get twice-yearly inspections.
Just as with an audio turntable, fluidity and consistency are
prized. As a Macton brochure explains, "It must move smoothly
and quietly day in and day out for years, with only routine maintenance.
And it must be free of perceptible accelerations."
In other words, diners should not be immediately aware that they
are revolving. Like Muzak, the effect should be discernible but
not overwhelmingly apparent. The goal is consumption--of both food
and vistas--not stomach-tickling sensation. Which is not to say
an "experience" is lacking. Revolving restaurants, after all,
were pioneers of themed entertainment dining, where people willingly
pay more for food if they're offered something above and beyond
gustatory pleasure.
The face of entertainment has changed, of course--today, a tourist
in New York is more likely to buy a T-shirt at the Hard Rock Cafe
than eat at the Marquis. But revolving restaurants offer something
beyond a kitschy appeal or the pretensions of fine dining. They
offer the city itself, arrayed as a subtly drifting panorama,
viewed from a circular dining car on a radial journey where distance
is transformed into time, with departure and arrival points fixed
like points on a clock. While to us they may seem like artifacts
suitable for Disney's quaintly futuristic Tomorrowland, in the
world's fresher skylines revolving restaurants are still symbols
of arrival, evidence of mechanical, social, and economic progress.
And as they whir silently above the fluid cityscapes of Cairo
and Kuala Lumpur and Hong Kong, they are observation posts for
change itself.
TOM VANDERBILT is a contributing editor to The Baffler and author of The Sneaker
Book: Anatomy of an Industry and an Icon (New Press, 1998).
|
|