Sustainable Metropolis World Trade Center Live@Metropolis Next Generation Designmart Events tropgreen

Sustaining life on Earth is the shared responsibility of all human beings. When will design professionals and their clients accept this responsibility? What of educators? Are they preparing to teach the next generation of designers about their changing roles? And how can design students learn about working in an ecologically endangered world?




Related Articles:
» The Sustainable Metropolis
» Teaching Green at ICFF 2002
» Speaker Biographies


Offsite:
U.S. Green Building Council, www.usgbc.org.
"Teaching Green" was a deceptively simple title for the Metropolis conference, held this year at the International Contemporary Furniture Fair (ICFF), on May 20th, in New York City's Jacob K. Javits Convention Center. It was clear from the outset that bringing the idea of sustainability into design education involves far more than just schools, educators, and students. The subject touches all aspects of design practice, just as it touches all aspects of life.

A total of 560 people--282 designers, 227 students, and 51 educators--responded to a Metropolis survey posted on the magazine's Web site in April 2002. The results were tabulated by Audience Profiler and were used by facilitator Susan S. Szenasy to set the tone for the discussion at the conference in May.

Most revealing about the state of green design education today is that 62 percent of design professionals learned about sustainability by whatever means they could find, including the 18 percent who took continuing-education courses. The most shocking answer came from the students: though 86 percent of them expressed an interest in the topic, 69 percent weren't sure how many sustainable-design courses are required in their schools.

Those students might be in for a surprise when they start looking for jobs as 75 percent of the surveyed designers said their clients are interested in sustainable design. There's no lack of interest among design educators in sustainability either: 92 percent expressed interest but cited barriers--their own education and school administrators' attitudes--to its integration in design curriculum.


Teaching Green:
» Full Survey Report
It was the job of the 26 speakers, panelists, and respondents to focus on what gets designed today and how the experience of design practices might inform the education of new designers. They were chosen from such varied areas as interior design, architecture, and engineering, as well as from professional organizations and government agencies. There were also educators, students, developers, and building owners. Missing, as several audience members pointed out, were industrial designers as well as communication and graphic designers.

Hillary Brown started off the proceedings by setting the conferees on an ethical course. Integral to the production of the High Performance Building Guidelines for New York City's Department of Design & Construction, Brown, an architect, now runs New Civic Works and teaches at Columbia University.

"We must be accountable, think ecologically and understand what that responsibility brings to design, and embrace our aesthetic loyalty to nature," she challenged the gathered. "We also need to realize that ecology offers us a model, a sense of the interrelatedness of things and systems, suggesting a bringing of adjacent disciplines into the integrated design process."

Brown assessed the sustainable-design movement in the United States as a plotted "curve of public ideas." These include experimentation, pilot projects, supporting infrastructure (such as the U.S. Green Building Council, USGBC), popularization (government guidelines and policy instruments, including the USGBC's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design [LEED] rating system), electoral politics (executive orders and ordinances), and regulations (requiring projects to meet standards).

"Green is in lockstep with good governance," Brown said. "Services are rendered more effectively and efficiently in green buildings, and the LEED system speaks the language of the layman. People can readily see how the LEED principles resonate with their own needs."

But if we are making a headway in policy and principles, when will we see practicing architects, designers, and academics begin to respond to this demand? Brown went on to ask other key questions: "How quickly can the emerging generation and future generations become grounded in the formal, technical, theoretical, and ethical fundamentals of green? Why doesn't our collective definition of design excellence automatically include accountability for environmental performance? What will it take to shift the design culture's emphasis on object-oriented buildings to those that are more outcome-oriented? Is there a perception that green design is somewhat anti-aesthetic or anti-intellectual? How can an ecological approach be made intrinsic to design curricula and more robustly worked into the studio?"

First, as Brown began to answer her own questions, she suggested that we teach accountability--cause and effect. "There are environmental implications to each pencil stroke," she said. "We must design with awareness about input, output, emissions, embodied energy, and more. By making us measure and talk about our actions, our green design tools are actually allowing us to celebrate the improvements. They are good practice, and they are motivators."

Second, she added, we need to acknowledge the sensuous imperative. "We are learning that design that responds to bioclimate, topography, and other factors is more comfortable and efficient. Rather than neutralizing or controlling nature, the built environment should put us in touch with it." Brown then suggested that a symbiotic relationship with nature is perhaps the most pressing emotional and spiritual need of our time.

And third, Brown noted, design is interdisciplinary and it is a participatory process. "The collaborative nature of sustainable design is one of its most significant and transformative shifts." She went on to explain that "the process itself is important, and social capital is a critical by-product. This represents a shift from the idea that individual creativity is the purest and noblest act. We are going from egocentric to ecocentric."


 

BACK TO TOPBACK TO TOP