Paul Rand
by Steven Heller
Phaidon Press
240 pp., $69.95
A full-scale survey of Paul Rand, who branded even his own name.
by Alexandra Lange
It's too bad that Nike CEO Phil Knight can't appeal to Paul Rand for
help. As the ubiquitous Swoosh becomes as much a symbol of corporate
greed and exploited Southeast Asian workers as it is of athletic
prowess, Rand might have a fix quicker than Knight could dispatch
Michael Jordan to Singapore.
Think of three resonant, established logos, and, chances are, at least
one of them was created by Rand, the father of modern branding. With his
succinct philosophy that "the trademark should embody in the
simplest form the essential characteristics of the product or
institution being advertised," Rand practically created the
corporate logo culture. Were IBM, Westinghouse, UPS, or ABC on your
list? All Rand's. (In case you're wondering, the CBS eye is William
Golden's.) Rand wrote manual after manual for in-house designers about
how to polish their logos, but he also knew how to have fun with the
process and ratchet down the corporatism and jargon. One of his posters
for IBM replaced the "I" and the "B" with an eye and
a bee, leaving only the signature striped "M." (Management
embargoed it, on the grounds that "It wasn't IBM.") In a
Westinghouse annual report, Rand showed the sticks and dots of the
"W" being blown away.
Steven Heller's book is the first full-scale survey of Rand's work since
his death two years ago, and the only one not undertaken by the man
himself (talk about branding). After wrangling for years with subpar
copywriters, Rand knew better than most artists the importance of
delivering the right message through text, too. He wouldn't have been
disappointed in Heller, his friend and frequent interlocutor, who has a
smooth, conversational style in this monograph and knows well enough not
to even attempt to upstage his subject. It's a wise decision, as Rand,
uninterrupted, offers pronouncements like: "A cigar is almost as
commonplace as an apple, but if I fail to make ads for cigars that are
lively and original, it will not be the cigar that is at fault,"
and, "Catering to bad taste, which we so readily attribute to the
average reader, merely perpetuates that mediocrity."
Heller sketches a history of so-called "good design" in the
U.S. through chapters that thematically survey Rand's career--implying
that Rand had pulled everyone else behind him, first in advertising,
then in book design, and then in the corporate logo game. It's likely
that this is a fairly accurate assessment, and Heller supports it with
tantalizing biographical information amidst examples of the design
work.
Illuminating is the fact that Rand, who almost single-handedly brought
European modern graphic design to the United States, got his entire
import out of the pages of a magazine--a single copy of Gebraushgrafik,
from a tiny bookstore next door to the Brooklyn Paramount theater. No
Bauhaus pilgrim better understood the power of grids and the burning
need "to turn down the typographic volume" in American
advertising. Exactly why Rand felt such affinity for Laszlo Moholy-Nagy,
A.M. Cassandre, and E. McKnight Kauffer is shrouded in
(self-aggrandizing?) mystery, but it's clear that he was always a
stranger in a strange land. Born in 1914, his first drawings were of the
Palmolive babes from the ads hanging in his father's Brooklyn store. In
high school, he attended Pratt by night and broke with his family's
Orthodox Judaism. Rand changed his name from Peretz Rosenbaum while
looking for his first job. He was one of the few Jews in the advertising
world then.
Amusing is Rand's brash presentation style. He usually gave corporate
chiefs only one logo to "choose" from, accompanied by a
booklet explaining why his design was not merely attractive, but
inevitable. "'I was convinced that each typographic example on
the first few pages was the final logo,'" Steve Jobs recalls of
Rand's book for NeXT, which showed the four letters, then paired them
with the computer's signature black box, and then arranged them in a
square. Jobs thought he was getting lovely typography, but Rand's final
logo was more than that. "'I was not quite sure what Paul was
doing until I reached the end. And at that moment I knew we had a
solution... Rand gave us a jewel, which in retrospect seems so
obvious.'"
Ironic is the story behind the logo maker's own moniker. "He
figured that 'Paul Rand,' four letters here, four letters there,
would create a nice symbol," remembers a friend. Then he proceeded
to affix the icon of his identity--no naming consultant could have
planned it better--to every piece of his work, including that for
clients. He threatened to quit when one boss asked him to remove his
name from a Dubonnet ad in the 1940s. It was the only advertising he
ever had to do. And someone else paid to distribute his brand.
A trendsetter for decades, Rand ran into criticism from younger
designers after the 1991 publication of "From Cassandre to
Chaos," in the AIGA Journal of Graphic Design. His article was a
criticism of "deconstructive" or "experimental"
graphics, a movement that was new and hip and had a growing number of
fans at the time. Reviews of his second book, Design, Form and Chaos
(1993), made him sound cranky and defensive: "Rand's wholesale
condemnation of recent design becomes a blunt instrument for dismissing
whatever comes in his path," J. Abbott Miller wrote in Graphis in
1993.
But Rand must have felt that he had triumphed over the chaos set in the
end. In 1996, a month and a half before his death, he and Heller
appeared at Cooper Union. Heller writes: "Over one thousand
attendees, at least half of them young students (many more, boasted the
school's Dean, than attended David Carson's lecture the previous Spring)
packed the hall for Rand's penultimate appearance." His ultimate
appearance, at MIT, earned him an invitation to teach at the
cutting-edge Media Lab from a professor of aesthetics and
computation--two academic disciplines that Paul Rand, the hard-working
aesthete, employed by the century's largest computer conglomerates,
probably never studied.
ALEXANDRIA LANGE is a staff writer at New York magazine.