Do You Really Think Your iPhone Is Cooler Than My RAZR?
Remember how cool and covetable Motorola’s RAZR V3 seemed when it was released in 2004? Here was a stylish, ultra-slim (if not quite razor-thin) cell phone that looked great, took photos, and fit in your rear jeans pocket. It also initially cost $600 with a wireless service agreement ($800 without), making it wildly inaccessible to most consumers.
As soon as prices came down, in 2006, I dumped my old wireless provider and signed up with a new one that was offering the RAZR at a deep discount. It was everything I had dreamed of. The problem was that everyone else seemed to have the same dream. Soon the RAZR was ubiquitous. The streets of New York City were clogged with people yakking into slender black clamshells. Tony Soprano ordered mob hits on a silver RAZR. Even my mom got one.
But now that the iPhone has become the phone fetish object of the moment, I find myself increasingly fond of my old, unfashionable RAZR. Sure, it’s got a distracting layer of dust trapped under the screen, and the enamel has recently started peeling. I can’t use it for Google Maps or iTunes or photo slideshows. The call volume could be a little louder. But it gets the job done—and, for my money, it is actually more appealing as a design object than the iPhone.
Back in January, Gizmodo pointed out the similarities between some of Dieter Rams’s 1960s designs for Braun and Jonathan Ive’s recent Apple products. There are, indeed, some startling parallels. But the RAZR’s rectangular shape and unadorned good looks (when closed) strike me as more Teutonic and, indeed, more Rams-ian than the gadgety iPhone. Sometimes I wonder if Motorola’s designers weren’t paying homage to an earlier breed of electric razor.

Images of Braun shavers from plutonium*’s Flickr photostream
And Braun isn’t the only iconic design company that Motorola seems to be referencing (wittingly or not). Does anyone else think the telecom company’s logo looks suspiciously similar to that of furniture giant Herman Miller?








Twitter
















fact is , the Motorola interface is hopeless, regardless of the (then) leading edge industrial design. The iphone is all about the user experience as the software is lightyears ahead of everyone else (just like the Mac!) though Nokia’s S60 phones are pretty sophisticated, the Mac OS in the iphone has the greatest ease of use and amazing soon-to-be-seen expandability.
Comment by stephen barlow-lawson — June 3, 2008, @ 3:39 pm
I wouldn’t call the iPhone ‘gadgety. It looks pretty sleek. Although it cracks me up whenever a Mac user says stuff like iPhone being light years ahead of everything. One, there were PC based phones that did more than iPhone and two years before. (Yes, they looked downright ugly and boring.) Two, I think the Mac product design does have a retro feel to it. Those rounded corners of the 70’s. But the previous commenter is dead on about the experience. Software and hardware wise the experience of many Mac products set the pace.. Iphone, all in one desktop computers. The idea of all that the Mac/iPhone/iPod etc. can do in such a simple package is something I think resonates with people today. They want to do a lot, not be defined by one part of their lives, so the simpler the appearance the easier to be unique in a way. That is the marketing, everyone has an iPod, but it is individuality that Mac sells. Ironic and iconic.
Comment by Robert Bell — June 4, 2008, @ 9:47 am