Eye on the Ball


Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:50 pm

When the ball drops on Times Square this New Year’s Eve, it will cast 32,256 LEDs flashing some 16 million colors over the scores of kazoo-tooting tourists who people the event each year. It will be bigger, brighter, and glitzier than ever before. It will be, to quote one spokeswoman, “truly befitting the glory of New York.” But will it befit the city’s newfound spotlight on energy efficiency?

Yes and no. Last year’s ball had fewer LEDs that, though 10 to 20 percent less efficient, drew less power overall—the equivalent, the organizers boasted, of 10 toasters. This year’s ball, unveiled Tuesday in a dark warehouse in Yonkers, New York, complete with a mock count-down, latter-day Frank Sinatra rasping “New York, New York” over the speakers, and original, ball-inspired poetry (“It Glimmers & Cracks Open/ Brilliant Joyous Dawn”), has more than three times as many LEDs and will radiate from its perch atop One Times Square year-round. In keeping with the domestic metaphor, the organizers assure us that it’s no more wasteful than powering two ovens.

Maybe so, but there’s nothing efficient about permanently illuminating a 12-foot decorative dome in an area already so bright and tacky it looks like a Liberace fever dream. And given the city’s aggressive drive to tamp down on greenhouse gas emissions under the aegis of third-term hopeful Mayor Michael Bloomberg, it would seem an odd move. (I should note that the building’s owners, not the city, funded the ball, reported at several million dollars.) Then again, did you see last year’s design? It looked like a pearl onion on a shish kebab. This won’t do in New York. Looking back over the ball’s 101-year history, razzle-dazzle has always been the crucial design aesthetic, from its early days as a 700-pound, iron-and-wood behemoth to its ’90s incarnation as an aluminum, rhinestone and computer-controlled testament to the heady excess of the digital age. Today, sustainability might be a sign of the times, but spectacle is the city’s legacy. And this year, more than any other year, the city needs its Brilliant Joyous Dawn.

             

(Click images to see it in full-glitter glory)

Bookmark and Share

Categories: Uncategorized

2 Comments »
  1. […] on the market. Even so, it’s hard to shake the feeling that while LEDs might be a good choice for Times Square, they’re still a ways off from lighting your office. No Comments so far Leave a comment […]

    Pingback by Taking a chance on LEDs - the Lighting Facts metric « The Living It Green Expo — March 22, 2009, @ 5:46 am

  2. […] on the market. Even so, it’s hard to shake the feeling that while LEDs might be a good choice for Times Square, they’re still a ways off from lighting your […]

    Pingback by Taking a chance on LEDs - the Lighting Facts metric « Green Valley Arkansas — April 4, 2009, @ 11:58 am

Leave a comment




  • Sponsored by Kimball Office



    Contact Us
       pov@metropolismag.com

    Follow Us
        Blog feed
        Magazine feed
        Newsletter
        Twitter
  • Featured Items

  • Most Commented

  • Popular Topics

  • Popular Categories

  • Elsewhere on This Site

  • Elsewhere on the Web

  • Metropolis Books












  • BACK TO TOPBACK TO TOP