Rising Tide
As numerous studies have shown, the polar ice caps are disappearing at an alarming rate. Global warming or climate change, or however you choose to characterize what’s happening to our planet, will inevitably result in rising sea levels. Are we ready for this potentially calamitous eventuality? Of course not. (Silly question.) We’re not likely to prepare for it until it’s too late. In fact I doubt much (if any) of the federal stimulus money will go toward planning for a future where sea levels might rise as high as five feet. Instead we’re likely to see a lot of pothole remediation (shovel-ready projects!) and politically inspired pork (Bridge to Nowhere).
The ideas for this newer, wetter world will have to come from designers. In that spirit, the Bay Conversation and Development Commission out in San Francisco recently announced winners of the Rising Tides Competition. The competition, which drew 130 entries from 18 countries, challenged designers to create waterfront strategies that envisioned a 55-inch rise in sea level over the next century.
Instead of awarding the $25,000 grand prize to one winner, the impressive jury (Michael Sorkin; Walter Hood, the landscape architect; Marcel Stive, scientific director of the Water Research Centre in Holland; Denise Reed, a professor and water researcher at the University of New Orleans; and Tracy Metz, an American-born Dutch architecture critic) decided to split the prize six ways. Below is at the winners’ ideas:
Click the images for larger PDFs of the winners’ proposals.
Topographical Shifts at the Urban Waterfront, by Wright Huaiche Yang and J. Lee Stickles
100 Year Plan, by Derek James Hoeferlin, Ian Caine, and Michael Heller
RAYdike, by Thom Faulders
BAYARC, by a team of designers and engineers from SOM
Folding Water, by Liz Ranieri and Byron Kuth, of Kuth Ranieri Architects
Evolutionary Recovery, by Yumi Lee + Yeon Tae Kim, of LANDplus Design












Twitter













1/5/09 BCDC: “The Commission voted to authorize the executive director to enter into a $25,000 (contract) with Meckel Design Consulting to manage an international design competition…”
An additional $50,000 from the feds would go to awards. Meckel, CCA Director of Planning and competition organizer, coordinated the jury, and miraculously half of the “winners,” were 3 backwater CCA instructors, while the competition boasted 18 nations.
The usual are present, like CCA Trustee Byron Kuth and instructor T. Faulders. K/R suggests an inane levee for the dynamic, deep waters of the bay which would destroy the existing coastline. Faulders’ lasers draw an ugly path around the bay to show the path of future neanderthal earthen dikes.
At least do some homework pseudo-professors, there already exist sophisticated dike systems in other countries that aren’t like the superficial walls you imagine.
Comment by arch revischild — July 16, 2009, @ 3:07 pm
What a mean-spirited and unfounded accusation - and anonymous to boot, a sure sign of cowardice. The entries were of course under motto, and even if they hadn’t been, two of the jurors - myself and Marcel Stive - live abroad and would have had no idea who these people were anyway. Nor did David Meckel interfere with or try to influence us in any way. I might point out that of the 7 honorable mentions three were from other countries.
Comment by Tracy Metz — July 27, 2009, @ 3:29 pm