Preservation vs. Accessibility


Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:55 pm

gpv018_smLast Saturday I attended a wedding at New York’s Players Club, which occupies a historic 19th-century mansion on Gramercy Park South, next to the National Arts Club. After getting out of the car with my forearm crutches, I navigate a brightly painted step down to the entry then push myself up four steps, where I am confronted by a curved half-flight of stairs up to the parlor floor where the event will be held. An extremely nice coat-check attendant—who seems willing to almost carry me upstairs—tells me that although the building has an elevator, it does not stop at the parlor floor. So I give one crutch to my wife, Eugenie, and slowly ascend the stairs one at a time, my left hand on the rail and my right arm in a crutch, all the while struggling against the flow of traffic heading downstairs.

Once we are on the correct level things are great and, providentially, I don’t need the bathroom two flights down. But what would I have done in a wheelchair?

The Players is a wonderful place, a historic Greek Revival townhouse that’s part of a landmark historic-preservation district. The interiors are worthy of landmark status as well, filled as they are with early 19th-century detail and pictures of great performers of the past hundred years.

Still, I must say that making this building accessible may have been easier if the preservationists stood aside and allowed some quick solution to be put in place—at least until the preservation community can raise the funds to provide the club the means to make a historically-sensitive permanent solution.

.
Players Club photo from www.museumplanet.org



Categories: Accessibility Watch

advertisement
advertisement
2 Comments »
  1. MuseumPlanet.com has narrated slide tours of historic sites in New York City and Venice, Italy.

    Comment by David Brown — October 14, 2009, @ 12:37 pm

  2. The story begs the question: should there be some sort of time limit on ADA exemptions for historic buildings? It’s one thing to say that historic landmarks should not have to be brought up to speed ASAP. But almost 20 years after the ADA, I think it might be time to open up the possibility of long-term accessibility planning as a requirement, perhaps with a board that can still provide exemptions after review. I wonder how many historic buildings never even look into the possibilities because they are not required to do so.

    Comment by bess — October 20, 2009, @ 11:18 am

Leave a comment

  • Connect With Us

  • Recent Posts

  • Most Commented

  • Metropolis Books




  • Links

  • BACK TO TOPBACK TO TOP

    Featuring Recent Posts WordPress Widget development by YD