Bjarke Strikes Again
Leave it to Bjarke Ingels to win a competition for his proposal for a new waste to energy plant by designing a 31.000 m2 ski slope. The competition, which yielded 36 proposals in fall 2010, was the largest environmental initiative in Denmark. With a budget of 3.5 Billion DKK, competing teams designed structures to replace a 40- year-old Amagerforbraending plant in Copenhagen with a more sustainable waste energy plant.
Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) decided to approach their design in a way that truly celebrates the idea of sustainability. What they call “hedonistic sustainability,” refers to design that improves the quality of life, both directly and indirectly- ecologically and socially.
Physical exercise and fresh air are rarely associated with waste treatment plants. But here the ski slope reaches out to citizens and gives them a new recreational facility, even as it creates a new relationship between waste plant and city. It shows a connection between shaping a healthy future and disposing waste. And it employs the latest technologies in waste treatment, while focusing on environmental performance. This is not a hidden, isolated, utility structure, but a celebration of health and well being.
BIG really topped itself this time. While the firm’s buildings continue to be green, innovative, and never fail to surprise, here they propose the ultimate in sustainability. The ski slope, made from recycled materials, sits atop a building wrapped in a green facade formed by plant modules. Beneath this living skin are new waste management and energy management technologies. This building takes the idea of mixed use to a whole new level. Shouldn’t all our buildings strive to do the same?
We featured Bjarke Ingels’s 8House in our December 2010 issue, and he also answered a few questions for us recently. His Mountain Dwellings project was featured in our December 2008 issue.









If we love it, will it last?
Re-imagining Infrastructure: Part II
Getting to the (living) future… or 100% for all?
The Big Apple vs. the City of Lights
Lab Report: XXVIII
Something old, something new
Q&A: Nina Rappaport
Tough Love
Made in America



How much energy and C02 will be spent making (via massive air conditioners), distributing, and maintaining the artificial snow necessary to maintain this monstrosity through Copenhagen’s 10 months of every year in which temperature is historically above freezing? Shame on you Metropolis for lauding such a wasteful idea in 2011. Your affinity to ego-maniacal starchitecture was forgivable in the 90s but there is no excuse now.
Submitted to http://www.kunstler.com/eyesore.html
Comment by starchitectsareruiningtheworld — February 8, 2011, @ 9:56 pm
Re: the comment from starchitectsareruiningtheworld
You forget elevation. There is a huge difference in temperature when you go from ground level to the top of a mountain, even if it’s a man made mountain. Consider the whole picture before jumping to conclusions and accusing people of ruining the world.
Comment by Anna — August 27, 2011, @ 3:59 pm
Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.
Comment by Jakob Perlman — January 26, 2012, @ 10:20 am