Subscribe to Metropolis

Towards a Car-less California


Saturday, July 23, 2011 12:36 am

Traffic ahead of the I-405 shutdown, photo via the Daily Mail.

When America’s busiest freeway, Interstate 405, closed temporarily for mandatory construction from July 16-17, all of Los Angeles broke out in panic as drivers canceled weekend plans and signs flashed on every freeway in the region preparing locals for anticipated delays. The LAPD even recruited popular celebrities on Twitter, including Ashton Kutcher and Kim Kardashian, to broadcast a warning so people would stay off the roads, during what was referred to as the “Carmaggedon.” But 53-hours of blocked access and apocalyptic panic later, LA did not find itself in a hopeless gridlock. Instead, the anticlimactic closure proved how much Californians depended on the 10-mile route, yet how surprisingly easy it also was to abandon their cars for 2 days.

When the freeway opened up again, the city quickly returned to its usual congested state as drivers hopped back into their cars. But now that LA has caught a glimpse of the city with less traffic and carbon footprint, it’s tempting to want to make it a sustained reality. While a car-free California may be too ambitious and premature given the culture and structure the cities were built on, it isn’t stopping various groups from initiating a movement. In efforts to shift people on the West Coast from their cars to public transit, companies have been rethinking the structure of their transit system, proposing technological and conceptual designs as solutions.

Li_Gehle_TeamThe design team of Gensler’s Network_LA Transit.

Gensler Los Angeles recently designed a phone-based application, Network_LA Transit, which generates flexible vehicle choices, by managing individual commuting needs through a system of data. The network adapts and restructures existing transportation systems such as bicycles, scooters and the LA Metro, while personalizing them to individual commuter needs. It works by keeping current transportation stops, but also liberating the routes to respond to user demands. Network_LA Transit integrates real-time data from ground transport, stops and users through a GPS application, tripFinder, to generate optimal itineraries for each user. The user-driven on-demand system resembles the New York-based social transit system, Weeels that promotes the sharing of for-hire vehicles. Having tried Weeels before, I understand that shortcomings of the program are due to the assumption that most people own a smart phone, and are enthusiastic about sharing a cab with strangers. As a social application, unless Network_LA Transit is embraced by a large population of participants, its implementation may not prove to be effective.

Over in San Francisco, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) has turned to the design-consulting division at BMW to design their new fleet of trains. BART trains are currently the oldest in the country, that are still in operation, and the system recognizes the need to upgrade. Realizing that the new design has to appeal to its potential users in order to increase ridership, BART created a mobile seat lab in all of its nine districts to allow people to say what kind of seat material, width and height they would prefer. Among the 2,200 responses, passengers have expressed the need for wider aisles, that they preferred cleanliness to comfort and felt strongly against upholstery on seats. Following this research, 800 to 1,000 redesigned trains will go through several iterations of testing and mock-ups before they are rolled out in 2020. But hiring a high-profile design team isn’t cheap, so in order for locals to give up driving and opt for BART instead, the trains not only need to be redesigned for comfort, safety and convenience but also appeal to commuters economically.

Last weekend’s Carmaggedon demonstrated that Californians are still very much dependent on driving in 2011, and to imagine a weekend without it, induces widespread fear. Perhaps the two-day shut down was just too sudden for most people. With well-researched design solutions and careful transition, it’s not impossible to move towards more alternatives to driving and restructure the West Coast in a more transit-friendly way. As proven by Carmaggedon, this movement won’t happen overnight, but it’s a good vision that many are already working towards.



Categories: In the News

advertisement
advertisement
6 Comments »
  1. I hope that people who abandoned their cars for a few days found other things to do and weren’t just stuck at home. As a New Yorker I know how easy it is to live without a car, but everything I need is nearby.

    Comment by Daniela — July 25, 2011, @ 1:30 pm

  2. Just thought I’d link to this critique of the Gensler vision:

    http://www.humantransit.org/2011/07/los-angeles-gensler-architects-attack-citys-transit-future.html

    Comment by Carlton Glüb — July 26, 2011, @ 1:02 pm

  3. BART’s trains are not the oldest in the country. New York City’s R32-series trains, which run on the C train, are older than even the oldest of BART’s rolling stock by 4 years. Chicago’s 2200-series trains are also from the same era as BART’s older trains, with the former from 1969-1970 and the latter from 1968-1971.

    BART’s *fleet* may have the oldest average age, but their trains are not the oldest still in operation.

    Comment by Justin N — July 26, 2011, @ 1:18 pm

  4. The closure of the 405 is hardly a watershed event in creating a car free LA. Los Angeles has built and continues to build rail transit in many areas, and the areas served are full of people who live car free. The west side is mainly suburban, not urban, and the 405 is the ONLY link in that area between the city and the Valley. This Gensler approach seems to be made by people who not only are ignorant of how transit works, but who seem to have no direct experience with it. The Los Angeles MTA (bus and rail) has the second highest ridership in the US after New York, but to hear Gensler speak, you’d think there was no system in place at all. Sad.

    Comment by Bert Green — July 28, 2011, @ 8:30 pm

  5. I disagree with your cost per commute comparing an auto trip and a rapid rail trip. First off you do not list the same criteria for rapid transit that you do for the auto, and 2nd, I am sure there are many other costs per commute by rapid rail that you are not listing; like the cost to subsidize the construction and annual operation of rapid rail. Be fair in your comparison.

    Comment by Rick — August 10, 2011, @ 10:15 am

  6. Cheryl,

    As a former LA resident who was never a big fan of hours wasted sitting in traffic. I think you should check out TransLoc!!

    TransLoc’s GoLive Project: TransLōc (http://transloc.com/), a Raleigh-based transportation info company, developed GoLive. GoLive is the first project in the nation that integrates several transit agencies (TTA, Durham, Chapel Hill, CAT, NCSU, C-Tran) trip information into one elegant, user-friendly app. Riders have a real-time view of buses in route on a detailed online map, allowing for the seamless planning of trips using public transit in the Triangle. GoLive is accessible on the web, smartphones or by text message. The project launched this month, and will hopefully become an example for other cities/regions to imitate across the US. Additionally, TransLoc hopes to be integrated into public policies in city planning, promoting sustainable city planning which account for public health, accessibility, and eco-friendly living.

    Keep up the great job and promotion of more sustainable living!!!

    Comment by Mor Aframian — January 24, 2012, @ 9:29 am

Leave a comment

  • Recent Posts

  • Most Commented

  • View all recent comments
  • Metropolis Books




  • Links

  • BACK TO TOPBACK TO TOP

    Featuring Recent Posts WordPress Widget development by YD